Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13449 (ALL)

RAMNATH v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/40679/2026 · 2026-10-06

Saurabh Shyam Shamshery

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 40679 of 2026 Court No. - 36 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This writ petition has been filed seeking following reliefs: “ I) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing to the respondent no. 1 and 2 to remove the road constructed over the abadi land of the petitioner of Gata No. 388 c [388 Ga] situated in Village Bhojapur, Mauja Ranwa, Pargana Taalgram, Tahsil Chibaramau, District Kannauj. II) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing to the respondent no.2 to take the action against the respondent no. 4/5 under Section- 95 of the U.P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1947. III) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing to the respondent no. 2 to provide the possession to the petitioner over the abadi land of the petitioner over which the road has been constructed.“ 3. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, Court finds that it is a highly disputed fact, therefore, cannot be decided by this Court. However, this writ petition is disposed of with an observation that in case an application is filed before the appropriate authority which has jurisdiction to consider such nature of dispute, said authority will consider it in accordance with law. October 7, 2026 SB Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arvind Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Hari Narayan Singh (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.) Ramnath .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP BHATTACHARYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad