MD ARIFUDDIN AHMED ALIAS ARIF v. CHOLAMANDALAM MS GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD
I.A.(Civil)/2391/2026 · 2026-09-01
Mridul Kumar Kalita
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13444 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13444 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010144112026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2391/2026 MD ARIFUDDIN AHMED ALIAS ARIF S/O SAHABUDDIN AHMED R/O RONGAJAN KURUKA GAON P.O.MORONGI,P.S.GOLAGHAT. DISTRICT-GOLAGHAT,ASSAM. PIN-785702. VERSUS CHOLAMANDALAM MS GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AND HEAD OFFICE AT DARE HOUSE, 2ND FLOOR,NO.2 N.S.C. BOSE ROAD,CHENNAI - 600001 AND ITS BRANCH OFFICE AT AASTHA PLAZA,4TH FLOOR OPPOSITE TO S.B.DEORAH COLLEGE, G.S.ROAD,GUWAHATI.
2:SRI BABU KANTA BORI S/O LATE MON BORI R/O NOLONI PATHAR MERAPANI P.S.MERAPANI DISTRICT-GOLAGHAT ASSAM. PIN-785705. OWNER OF THE VEHICLE NO.AS-05-C2152TATA 207DI.
3:SRI RATUL DAS S/O SRI MANIK DAS R/O-VILLAGE -KRISHNA SWAMI P.O P.S.MERAPANI DISTRICT-GOLAGHAT ASSAM PIN-785705. DRIVER OF THE VEHICLE NO.AS-05-C2152TATA 207 D Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. P BARUAH, Advocate for the Respondent : MR. R GOSWAMI,
Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA ORDER Date : 02.09.2026
1. Heard Ms. P. Baruah, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. R. Goswami, learned counsel for the Insurance Company.
2. This interlocutory application has been filed by the applicant/claimant in connection with MAC Appeal No. 170/2023 praying for allowing the applicant/claimant to withdraw 50% of the awarded amount which has been deposited by the Insurance Company before the Registry of this Court in pursuant to the directions issued on 17.05.2023 in I.A.(C) No. 1182/2023.
3. The learned counsel for the Insurance Company has raised no objection, his only submission is that the claimant may be directed to furnish an indemnity bond to the extent of amount to be disbursed to him.
4. The prayer is accordingly allowed.
5. The Registry is directed to disburse 50% of the awarded amount which has been deposited by the Insurance Company before it in pursuant to the aforementioned order after proper verification to the present claimant/applicant on furnishing an indemnity bond of an amount equivalent to 50% of the awarded amount.
6. This interlocutory application is accordingly disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant