Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13442 (CHH)

VIKAS SINGH THAKUR v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/99/2026 · 2026-01-12

Shri Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 99 of 2026 1 - Vikas Singh Thakur S/o Manendra Bahadur Singh Aged About 46 Years R/o Chandimata Chowk, Kargi Road, Kota, Tahsil And P.S. Kota, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh Through Power Of Attorney Holder/ Accused Anil Kumar Gouliya, S/o Tilak Ram Gauliya, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Ward No. 03, Dak Bangla, Kargi Road, Kota, Tahsil And P.S. Kota, District Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station- Kota (Police Chowki Belgahana), District Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Respondent For Petitioner : Mr. T.R. Patel, Advocate. For State : Mr. Anish Tiwari, Dy. G.A. Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal Order on Board 13 / 01 / 2026 1. This petition has been preferred by the petitioner under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 being aggrieved by the impugned order dated 02.12.2025 passed by the learned Special Judge Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, Bilaspur, District – Bilaspur (C.G.) in HEERA LAL SAHU Digitally signed by HEERA LAL SAHU Date: 2026.01.13 17:32:27 +0530 2 Special Case (Mines and Minerals ) No. 27/2025 whereby the learned special judge has rejected the application under Section 497 of BNSS for releasing the vehicle on supurdnama. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to press this petition and wants to withdraw the same with liberty to file an appropriate application before the appropriate Bench. He prays to return the certified copy of the impugned order. 3. Learned State counsel pointed out that on 02.01.2026, CRR No. 1539/2025 was also dismissed as withdrawn by the counsel with liberty to file the appeal as provided under the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, but the counsel has filed this CRMP instead of an appeal. 4. Prayer is allowed. 5. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. The Registry is directed to return the certified copy of the impugned order to the counsel for the petitioner, after retaining a photocopy of the same. Sd/- (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Judge H.L. Sahu