HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 11240 of 2026 Court No. - 36 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Instructions filed today by learned Standing Counsel are taken on record. 2. On the basis of instructions, learned Standing Counsel submitted that against the order passed under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, restoration application was filed by the Gaon Sabha in which the order has been stayed. 3. In view of these developments, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. 4. Since the restoration application is pending, it will be appropriate to direct the concerned court to decide the same expeditiously. 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, with a direction to respondent No. 2 to consider and decide the aforementioned restoration application, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the opposite parties and giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. May 18, 2026 Ved Prakash Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Baijant Kumar Mishra, Shiv Shankar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Sudhir Bharti (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Ram Dayal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 27 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad