Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:15527 WP No. 3563 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 3563 OF 2026 (LA-KIADB) BETWEEN:
1.
GIRIGOWDA S, SON OF LATE SALGIRIGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, RESIDING AT: CHELUR VILLAGE, MARALWADI HOBLI, HAROHALLI TALUK, CHELUR - 562 112. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SURESH K, ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE (INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT), M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU - 560 001.
2.
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER-1 KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD, NO 39, BHARATH SCOURTS AND GUIDES BUILDING, SHANTHI GRUHA, Digitally signed by VIJAYA P Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:15527 WP No. 3563 of 2026 4TH FLOOR, PALACE ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. A.S. HARISH, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.1 SRI. B.S. KARTHIKEYAN, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.2)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTIFICATION ISSUED UNDER SECTION 28(4) OF THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT ACT, 1966, PRELIMINARY NOTIFICATION DATED 25.10.2006 ISSUED UNDER SECTION 28(1), VIDE NOTIFICATION BEARING NO. CI431SPQ.2006, NOTIFIED IN THE NAME OF PETITIONER FOLLOWED BY THE FINAL NOTIFICATION DATED 02.02.2010 ISSUED UNDER SECTION 28(4) VIDE NOTIFICATION CI 307 SPQ 2009 OF DATED 2.2.2010 TO AN EXTENT OF 2 ACRES AND 10 GUNTAS IN SY. NO 127 OF CHEELUR VILLAGE, MARALWADI HOBLI, HAROHALLI TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT AS PER ANNEXURE-A AND B AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FRESH MATTERS LIST, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:15527 WP No. 3563 of 2026 ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo, which reads as hereunder:
"The undersigned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner herewith submits that the said petition has become infructuous as the petitioner is seeking for consent award in a different writ petition filed before this Hon'ble Court. Hence, the petitioner prays to withdraw the said petition, same may be taken on record in the interest of justice and equity."
2. In light of the same, the petition is dismissed as not pressed. All contentions are kept open. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE SHS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9