Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13436 (CAL)

ANIK BISWAS v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR

CRM (A)/4135/2025 · 2026-01-22

Jay Sengupta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

AD 2 January 22, 2026 Ct. 28 SG CRM(A) 4135 of 2025 Reject An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Dhubulia P.S. Case No.360 of 2025 dated 02.09.2025 under Sections 77/3(5) of the BNS, 2023. And In the matter of: Anik Biswas … petitioner Mr. Dipanjan Chatterjee Ms. Kakan Das Ms. Rimpa Adhikari … for the petitioner Mr. B.K. Panda Mr. Asif Dewan ... for the State Report filed by the State is taken on record. The de facto complainant is present in Court in person. Perused the case diary. The prosecution case is that another co-accused had shot some obscene photos and videos of the minor victim girl. After he sold/gave the phone to the petitioner for repair, the petitioner circulated such photos and videos of the minor girl on social media. Considering the serious nature of allegations and the incriminating materials available in the case diary including the statements of witnesses recorded before the learned Magistrate, I do not consider this to be a fit case for granting anticipatory bail. 2 The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, rejected. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of requisite formalities. (Jay Sengupta, J.)