- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:23547 CRL.P No. 2245 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 2245 OF 2019 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. L. KUMAR GURU S/O D. LOKANATHAN AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/AT NO.87, SC ROAD, SHESADRIPURAM BENGALURU-560020 2. V. CHANDRASHEKAR S/O LATE VENKATANARAYAN AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/AT NO.225, 5TH 'C' MAIN, HRBR LAYOUT, KALYANANAGARA BANGALURU-560042 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. LEELADHAR H.P., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ULSOOR GATE POLICE STATION BENGALURU REP. SPP HIGH COURT BUILDINGS BANGALURU-560001 2. SRI. NYAMA GOWDA POLICE OFFICER ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE CCB, SPL ENQUIRY Digitally signed by HEMALATHA J Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:23547 CRL.P No. 2245 of 2019 N.T. PET, NEW TARAGUPETE BENGALURU-560053 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. M.R.PATIL, HIGH COURT GOVERNMENT PLEADER FOR RESPONDENT NO.1; NOTICE SERVED ON RESPONDENT NO.2 AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.47275/2010 (IN CRIME NO.446/2009) ON THE FILE OF IST ADDITIONAL CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, BENGALURU CITY, BENGALURU FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 419, 420, 465, 468, 471, 506 OF IPC, AGAINST THE PETITIONERS. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ ORAL ORDER The petitioners have challenged the proceedings initiated against them in C.C.No.47275/2010 pending on the file of the I Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru, for the offences punishable under Sections 419, 420, 465, 468, 471, 506 of IPC. 2. When this petition was listed for admission, the learned counsel for the petitioners seeks to withdraw this - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:23547 CRL.P No. 2245 of 2019 petition with liberty to move before the Trial Court for discharge. 3. The submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is noted. 4. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 5. Liberty is reserved to the petitioners to move before the Trial Court for discharge. If an application is filed for discharge, the Trial Court shall consider the same expeditiously, at any rate, within a period of thirty days from the date of filing the application, in the light of the fact that the cognizance of the offences is taken in the year 2010. 6. In view of dismissal of the petition, pending I.As., if any, do not survive for consideration and the same stand dismissed. Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE PMR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20