Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13428 (CAL)

PARTHA TALUKDAR @ TALUKDER v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR

CRM(M)/61/2026 · 2026-03-25

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

25.03.2026 Court No.35. D/L. 24. Kausik (Allowed) CRM (M) 61 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with Serampore Women Police Station Case No. 13 of 2020 dated March 17, 2020 under Sections 376(2)(f)/506/328 of the Indian Penal Code. And In the matter of : Partha Talukdar @ Talukder ……Petitioner. Mr. Navanil De Ms. Monami Mukherjee Ms. Moumita Karwa ……for the Petitioner. Mrs. Debjani Sahu ……for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the present application is for renewal of prayer for bail. Records reflect that last of the application was rejected by this Court on 29th August, 2022. Petitioner is in custody for 5 years and 9 months and according to the learned advocate appearing for the State, 3 witnesses have been examined till date. Prosecution has cited 19 witnesses in order to prove its case. Without entering into the merits of the case and having considered the period of detention of the present petitioner and that there is no scope of the trial being concluded within a reasonable period of time, I am of the view petitioner be released on bail. 2 Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. Accordingly, Petitioner, namely Partha Talukdar @ Talukder shall furnish bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand Only) with two sureties of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each. One of whom must be local to the satisfaction of Learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Serampore, Hooghly. If on bail, the petitioner shall be physically present on each and every date fixed by the learned Trial Court and shall not leave the jurisdiction of District of Hooghly without prior permission of the learned Trial Court. With the aforesaid observations CRM (M) 61 of 2026 is allowed. Report submitted by the State be kept with the record. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)