ATIKUR SHEKH ALIAS ATIKUR RAHMAN ALLIAS ATIKUR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./3768/2026 · 2026-05-15
Anubha Rawat Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13422 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13422 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:15138
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 3768 of 2026
Atikur Shekh @ Atikur Rahman @ Atikur, S/o- Iyasni Sk @ Yeasin Sk
… … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party ---
CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---
For the Petitioner : Md. Asadul Haque, Advocate
For the Opp. Party : Mr. Sanat Kumar Jha, APP
---
03/15.05.2026
Heard the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Pakur (Muffasil) P.S. Case No. 143 of 2025, registered under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 118, 117(2), 109(1), 303(2), 74, 352 and 351(2) of BNS, now pending in the court of learned S.D.J.M., Pakur.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner is in custody since 09.04.2026 and the anticipatory bail has been granted to other co-accused, but the prayer for Anticipatory Bail of the petitioner was rejected. He submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case.
4.
Learned counsel for the opposite party- State, on the other hand, has opposed the prayer and has submitted that as per the First Information Report itself, the victim has suffered grievous injury.
5. Considering the direct allegation made against the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail at this stage.
6. However, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge.
7. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned court concerned through “FAX/email”.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:15.05.2026 Pankaj Date of Uploading:16.05.2026