Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2026:CGHC:11491
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 651 of 2026 1 - Aagay Mandal S/o Josheph Mandal Aged About 23 Years R/o Tabarada Block Navagarh, Thana Udaygiri, District Udaygiri (Odissa) 2 - Ranjeet Rohito S/o Silbano Rohito Aged About 19 Years R/o Tabarada Block Nawagarh, Thana Udaygiri, District Udaygiri (Odissa)
.. Applicant(s) versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through Arakshi Kendra, Sirgitti, District Bilaspur (C.G.)
... Non-applicant(s) For Applicants : None For Non-applicant/State : Mr. Shailendra Sharma, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri
Ramesh Sinha
, Chief Justice
Order on Board 10.03.2026
1. This is an ofÏce reference.
2. This Court, vide order dated 25.01.2024 passed in MCRC No. 8418 of 2023, while allowing the bail of the applicants, namely, Aagay Mandal and Ranjeet Rohito, had expressed its trust that the trial Court would make an earnest endeavor to conclude the trial expeditiously in accordance with law, preferably within a period of six months from the KUNAL DEWANGAN Digitally signed by KUNAL DEWANGAN
2 date of receipt of a certified copy of the order, if there was no legal impediment.
3. Earlier on two occasions also, this Court had granted extension of time for compliance of the order dated 25.01.2024.
4. The learned Special Judge, (NDPS Act), Bilaspur, District-Bilaspur (C.G.) vide his request letter dated 19.02.2026 has requested for grant of four months time for concluding the trial.
5. It transpires from perusal of the PUD that at present, in the present case, the prosecution evidence could not be completed due to the continuous absence of the accused persons, namely Agay Mandal and Ranjeet Rohito. So far, the evidence of one prosecution witness has been recorded and as per the list of witnesses, the evidence of 11 prosecution witnesses are still required to be recorded. Therefore, it is most respectfully prayed that an additional period of four months may kindly be granted for the disposal of the case.
6. The request appears to be reasonable. The concerned trial Court is
directed to conclude the trial as early as possible, preferably within a further period of four months from today.
7. Accordingly, this CRMP stands disposed off with the aforesaid direction.
8. Registry is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha)
Chief Justice
Kunal