15-FA-316-2002 (C).docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO. 316 OF 2002 Rangrao Krishna Patil & Anr. …...Appellants Versus Gulab Ghanshyam Solase & Ors. …...Respondents —————— Mr. Tejas V. Shelake a/w. Ms. Sonal S. Nalawade i/b. Mr. P.D. Dalvi for Appellants. Ms. Asmita Killedar i/b. Mr. P.R. Arjunwadkar for Respondent No.1. —————— Coram : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J. Date : 1st October 2026. PER COURT : 1. On 24th September 2021, the following order was passed: 1. On 10th September 2026, the following order was passed : “1. This Appeal is of the year 2002. 2. Today, when this Appeal was called out, neither the Appellants, Respondents, nor the Advocates for the parties were present in Court either physically or through VC mode. 3. To afford an opportunity to the Appellants / Respondents / Advocates for the parties to appear and argue the case, list this Appeal on 24.09.2026, under the caption "For Disposal", on the Supplementary Board.” osk 1 of 3 15-FA-316-2002 (C).docx 2. Today, Ms. Sonal Nalawade, learned Advocate for the Appellants appears and again makes a request for an adjournment. 3. This Appeal is of the year 2002. As such, this Court was reluctant to grant an adjournment. However, considering the request made by Ms. Sonal Nalawade, learned Advocate for the Appellants, an opportunity is granted. 4. Ms. Sonal Nalawade, learned Advocate for the Appellants states that no further adjournment will be sought and requests that the matter be listed and taken up for final hearing at 4:30 p.m. 5. List the matter on 1st October 2026, under the caption “Prioritized Cases – Final Hearing Board.” 6. Ms. Sonal Nalawade, learned Advocate for the Appellants states that she would give private notice to the Respondents and file an affidavit of service in the Registry on or before the next date of hearing.” 2. Today, Mr. Tejas Shelake, learned Advocate for the Appellants, states that both the Appellants have passed away during the pendency of the Appeal and that he has no contact with the legal representatives of the Appellants. He further states that even the legal representatives of the Appellants have not contacted him. 3. Ms. Asmita Killedar, learned Advocate for the Respondent No.1, submits that, in view of the statement made by Mr. Tejas Shelake, learned Advocate for the Appellants, and in view of the death of both the Appellants, the Appeal stands abated. osk 2 of 3 15-FA-316-2002 (C).docx 4. In view of the statement made by Mr. Tejas Shelake, learned Advocate for the Appellants, the Appeal is disposed of as abated. 5. Fist Appeal No. 316 of 2002 stands disposed of as abated. [ ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J. ] osk 3 of 3 OMKAR SHIVAHAR KUMBHAKARN Digitally signed by OMKAR SHIVAHAR KUMBHAKARN Date: 2026.10.01 19:34:06 +0530