2026:JHHC:15197 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 3236 of 2026 Shivam Bhumihar @ Shivam Kumar @ Shivam Singh @ Shivam Kumar Bhumihar, aged about 19 years, S/o Sandeep Singh. … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Vikram Pradeep, Advocate : Mr. Bhawesh Kr. Tiwari, Advocate For the Opp. Party-State : Mr. Shailendra Kr. Tiwari, Sp. P.P. For the Informant : Mr. Mukesh Kr. Mehta, Advocate : Mr. Vishnu Prabhakar Pathak, Advocate : Mr. Akash Prasad, Advocate --- 07/15.05.2026 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 17.02.2026 in connection with Giridih (Town) P.S. Case No. 33 of 2026, for the alleged offence registered under Sections 75(2), 351(2), 351(3), 3(5) of BNS and Section 12 of POCSO Act and 66(E) of the I.T. Act pending in the court of learned District and Additional Session Judge-VIII-cum-Special Judge (POCSO) at Giridih. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not have any criminal antecedent and the charge sheet has already been submitted. He also submits that as per the allegation the victim was being pressurized by the petitioner to send her obscene video, but the petitioner received the obscene video of the victim from one Priyanshu Sahay and as per allegation the petitioner had made the video viral and as per statement of the victim Priyanshu Sahay had taken the objectionable video of the victim. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party-State has opposed the prayer for bail and has submitted that video has 2026:JHHC:15197 2 already been recovered. However, the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner is not in dispute 5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and charge sheet has already been submitted, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned District and Additional Session Judge-VIII- cum-Special Judge (POCSO) at Giridih in connection with Giridih (Town) P.S. Case No. 33 of 2026 on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below. 6. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 7. Let a copy of this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through ‘FAX/E-mail’. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) 15.05.2026 Rakesh/- Uploaded on:-16.05.2026