Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13413 (KAR)

SRI NARAYANASWAMY v. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

WP/2284/2026 · 2026-02-13

S R Krishna Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9084 WP No. 2284 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO. 2284 OF 2026 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SRI NARAYANASWAMY S/O LATE SRI DODDA MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, 2. SMT NANJAMMA W/O LATE SRI ASHWATHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, 3. SRI BYREGOWDA S/O LATE ASHWATHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, 4. SRI KRISNAPPA S/O LATE DODDA MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS, All R/AT GANGAVARA CHOWDAPANAHALLI VILLAGE, CHANNARAYAPATNA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-562110 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. M.D.RAGHUNATH., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER AND COMPETENT AUTHORITY, NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA, NH-207, NEAR SRIGANDA PETROL BUNK, NELAMANGALA-562123 Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9084 WP No. 2284 of 2026 2. SMT. KEMPAMMA AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS, W/O LATE RAMAIAH, RESIDENT OF VISHWANATHPURA VILLAGE, KUNDAN HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-562110 3. SRI RAJANNA @ NANJAPPA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, S/O KRISHNAPPA, R/OF VISHWANATHPURA VILLAGE, KUNDAN HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-562110 4. SRI BYREGOWDA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, S/O KRISHINAPPA, R/OF VISHWANATHPURA VILLAGE, KUNDAN HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-562110 5. SRI MUNIBYARAPPA DEAD BY HIS LRS SARALA V, W/O LATE MR MUNIBYRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, 6. HANUSHREE M A D/O LATE MUNIBYRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, 7. UNNATHI A M D/O LATE SRI MUNIBYRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS, 5 TO 7 R/AT NO. 3022-33, 4TH BLOCK, JANAPRIYA HEAVENS APARTMENT, ALLALASANDRA, BANGALORE NORTH, GKVK, BANGALORE. 8. SMT ANANDAMMA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9084 WP No. 2284 of 2026 D/O SRI KRISHNAPPA, R/O VISHWANATHPURA VILLAGE, KUNDAN HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-562110 9. SMT. SUNADAMMA BY LRS MUNIRAJU S/O LATE MUNIYAPPA, W/O LATE SUNANDAMMA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, 10. ARUN KUMAR S/O MUNIRAJU, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, 11. MADHU S/O MUNIRAJU, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, 12. GEETHA D/O MUNIRAJU, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, NOS.9 TO 12 ARE R/AT MADAPPANHALLI VILLAGE, RAJANKUNTE POST, HESARAGATTA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.K.SHIVASHANKAR, ADVOCATE FOR C/R2 SRI.PRAKASH ANGADI, ADVOCATE FOR R1 SRI P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R5 TO R7 SRI PRABHAKAR.K.L., ADVOCATE FOR R3 AND R4) THIS WP IS FILED PRAYING TO ALLOW THE PETITION AND QUASH THE ORDER DATED 05.01.2026 AT ANNX-G PASSED BY THE III ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC DEVANAHALLI, ON IA 4 FILED UNDER SEC. 151 CPC FOR DISBURSEMENT OF AMOUNTS AT ANNX-G IN MISC NO. 55/2017 AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9084 WP No. 2284 of 2026 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR ORAL ORDER In this petition, the petitioners seek the following reliefs: "a) Allow the Petition. b) Issue a Writ of Certiorari quashing the order dt:- 05.01.2026 at Annexure-G, passed by the III Addl. Sr. Civil Judge & JMFC, Devenahalli, on IA 4 filed Under Sec. 151 CPC for disbursement of amounts, At Annexure G in MISc.No.55/2017. c) Cost of the Petition, d) And pass such other order/s as this Hon'ble Court be pleased to grant to the Petitioner in the circumstances of the cases, in the interest of justice and equity." 2. On 27.01.2026, this Court passed the following interim order: "Heard. Sri. Prakash Angadi, learned counsel is directed to accept notice for respondent No.1. Copies to be served. Re-list on 03.02.2026. In the meanwhile, all further proceedings in Misc.No.55/2017 on the file of the III Addl. Senior Civil Judge & JMFC, Devanahalli, are hereby stayed, till the next date of hearing. Liberty is reserved in favour of the respondents to seek vacation / modification of this order." - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9084 WP No. 2284 of 2026 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the present petition may be disposed of reserving liberty in favour of the petitioners to take recourse to such remedies as available in law including seeking appropriate reliefs in RSA No.1241/2021 and the interim protection granted by this Court may be continued for a limited period. 4. Submission is placed on record. 5. A perusal of the material on record will indicate that the petitioners, who are not parties to the impugned proceedings, have no locus standi to file the present writ petition and as such present writ petition is not maintainable. 6. However in order to enable the petitioners to take recourse to such remedies as available in law and to seek appropriate reliefs in the pending RSA No.1241/2021, in the peculiar/unique/special facts and circumstances of the instant case, without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the rival contentions, I deemed it as inappropriate to continue the interim order passed by this Court for a period of three weeks from today. - 6 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9084 WP No. 2284 of 2026 7. Subject to the aforesaid directions and liberty reserved in favour of the petitioners and leaving open all contentions, petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE VM List No.: 2 Sl No.: 12