1 2026:CGHC:1833 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 6629 of 2025 1 - Sangam Mahila Swayam Sahayata Samuh Through The Secretary Smt. Sunita Devi, W/o Shivnath, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Village Mahuli, Tahasil- Wadrafnagar, Distt.- Balrampur-Ramanujganj (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The President, Food, Civil Supply And Consumer Protection Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan Naya Raipur, Post Office Rakhi, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Collector Balrampur District Balrampur-Ramanujganj (C.G.) 3 - Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue) Wadrafnagar, District Balrampur- Ramanujganj (C.G.) 4 - Food Inspector Wadrafnagar, District Balrampur-Ramanujganj (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Mishra, Advocate. For State : Mr. Rishabh Bisen, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 13/01 /2026 1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India assailing order dated 26.11.2025 issued by respondent No. 3/ Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue), Wadrafnagar, District- Balrampur- Ramanujganj by which the fair price shop allotted to the petitioner, has been cancelled. 2. In view of remedy of appeal available to the petitioner, it is directed that the petitioner shall prefer appeal before the appellate authority for redressal of grievance within 30 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order. In the eventuality of filing of appeal by the petitioner, ARUN KUMAR DEWANGAN Digitally signed by ARUN KUMAR DEWANGAN Date: 2026.01.13 17:00:05 +0530 2 neither the appellate authority nor the respondents will take a plea of limitation and will decide the appeal on its own merits. 3. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of. 4. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed anything on merits of the contentions raised by the parties and it is for the authorities to decide appeal preferred by the petitioner on its own merits. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Arun