$~185 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7940/2026 & CM APPL. 38228/2026 FEDRATION OF ALL INDIA PRIVATE ITIS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Sharawat , R. Adv. with Mr. Mayank Manish, Mr. Ravi Kant, Mr. Vineet Upadhyay, Mr. Ayush Aanand, Advs. versus DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF TRAINING .....Respondent Through: Mr. Mohit Bansal, CGSC with Mr. Neeraj Khatana, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH O R D E R % 20.07.2026 1. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following prayers :- “a) Issue a writ of certiorari and quash the office orders dated 16.01.2026, 27.02.2026 and addendum dated 09.04.2026 issued by the Respondent;…” 2. When the matter came up for hearing on 29.05.2026, this Court in paragraph Nos. 9, 10 and 11 held as under:- “9. In case the stipulated deadline of 30.06.2026 is missed, these Industrial Training Institutes ("ITIs") will not be permitted to take new admissions for the academic year 2026-2027, which will result in severe hardships and commercial death of these institutes. 10. For the said reasons, Mr. Bansal, learned CGSC, shall obtain instructions if the deadline of 30.06.2026 can be This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/07/2026 at 11:43:14 extended. 11. In the meanwhile, no coercive action shall be taken in ease some of the ITIs are not able to meet the stipulated deadline of 30.06.2026…” 3. Mr. Sharawat, learned senior counsel for the petitioner, states that there is a practical difficulty in the faculty approaching the Principal of Government ITIs as the Principal at times, is not available and the faculty has to wait for a couple of hours. Additionally, there are various procedural issues as well. 4. I am of the view that the respondent is only trying to evolve a system where there are no ghost faculty members and there are adequate staff members to teach the students. The steps taken by the respondent cannot be said to be unreasonable, malafide or arbitrary. However, the respondent shall be conscious of the fact that the faculty members of petitioners shall not be put to any undue harassment or inconvenience. 5. Mr. Kumar, Deputy Director of the respondent is present in Court today and states that the time limit for uploading the documents will be further extended by a period of 15 days from today. 6. Taking his statement on record and binding the respondent to the same, the present petition is disposed of. JASMEET SINGH, J JULY 20, 2026/sp This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/07/2026 at 11:43:14