Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13400 (RAJ)

MOHAMMED NOOR ISLAM S/O ALANUR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/4088/2026 · 2026-08-03

Anil Kumar Upman

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:30097] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 4088/2026 CNR: RJHC020616982026 | URN: CRLMP / 9213U / 2026 1. Mohammed Noor Islam S/o Alanur, Resident Of Ward No. 3, Karakhaniyan Ka Mohalla, Chaksu, District Jaipur. 2. Mohammed Kamran Son Of Mohammed Noor Islam, Resi- dent Of Ward No. 3, Karakhaniyan Ka Mohalla, Chaksu, District Jaipur. 3. Mohammed Kadar Son Of Mohammed Noor Islam, Resi- dent Of Ward No. 3, Karakhaniyan Ka Mohalla, Chaksu, District Jaipur. 4. Noor Ahamad Son Of Alanur Kha, Resident Of Ward No. 3, Karakhaniyan Ka Mohalla, Chaksu, District Jaipur. 5. Mohammed Nadeem Son Of Abdul Rasid, Resident Of Ward No. 13, L.b.s. Colony, Chaksu District Jaipur. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. 2. Asifa Bano Wife Of Altaf Hussain, Resident Of Ward No. 3, Karakhaniyan Ka Mohalla, Chaksu, District Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Susheel Pujari For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP Mr. Manoj Kumar Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 03/08/2026 1. By way of this Criminal Misc. Petition under Section 528 of the BNSS, the accused-petitioners have approached this Court with a prayer to quash the FIR No.348/2023 registered at Police Station Chaksu, District Jaipur City (South) for offences [2026:RJ-JP:30097] (2 of 3) [CRLMP-4088/2026] punishable under Sections 143, 323, 341, 354, 379 & 452 of the IPC, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that vide order dated 07.07.2026, parties were directed to appear before the Investigating Officer for verification of compromise. He submits that in compliance with the directions issued by this Court, the parties appeared before the Investigating Officer and endorsed the compromise. Counsel submits that on account of compromise, further proceedings in the impugned FIR are fruitless and continuation thereof would be a futile exercise and a waste of precious judicial time and resources. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor places on record the factual report dated 28.07.2026 received from SHO, Police Station Chaksu, District Jaipur City South. According to which, dispute has been resolved between the parties amicably. The said report is taken on record.. 4. Learned counsel for the complainant submits that complainant does not dispute the factum of compromise. He submits that complainant has no objection if the impugned FIR is quashed. 5. In view of the aforesaid and considering the submissions made on behalf of the respective parties; the material made available for perusal; considering the fact that parties have resolved their dispute amicably and also finding that the present case is wholly covered by the principle of law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh versus State of Punjab & Anr. reported in 2012 Cr.L.J. (SC) 4934 and in the [2026:RJ-JP:30097] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-4088/2026] case of State of Haryana & Ors. versus Choudhary Bhajan Lal & Ors. reported in AIR 1992 SC 604, the impugned FIR is liable to be quashed in view of compromise arrived at between the parties. 6. In view of the above, this Criminal Misc. Petition is allowed and the FIR No.348/2023 registered at Police Station Chaksu, District Jaipur City (South) is quashed and set aside qua the petitioners along with subsequent proceedings. Consequence to follow. 7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J GAUTAM JAIN/164