Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12664 WP No. 19267 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 19267 OF 2025 (SC-ST)
BETWEEN:
MR. RAMPRASAD RAJU S/O LATE V VARADARAJU AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS R/A NO. 155/A, 9TH MAIN RMV EXTENSION, SADASHIVANAGAR BENGALURU 560 080. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. NANDISH PATIL., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY THE SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001.
2.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU DISTRICT, BENGALURU - 560 009.
3.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BENGALURU NORTH SUB-DIVISION.
V.V. TOWER, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU 560001.
4.
MR. SHIVAPAL S/O M. KALASAPPA GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,
Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12664 WP No. 19267 of 2025
NO. 232, 5TH MAIN, CBI ROAD GANGANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 032.
5.
SMT. GOWRAMMA W/O LATE NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, R/AT KADIGANAHALLI VILLAGE, JALA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK-560 032. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.SHAMANTH NAIK., HCGP FOR R1 TO R3 SRI. V.B. SIDDARAMAIAH., ADVOCATE FOR R4)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED
ORDER DATED 24.06.2025 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 IN PTCL SC.ST(A) NO.13/2011-12 C/W SC.ST(A) NO.40/2011- 12 VIDE ANNEXURE-C IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
ORAL ORDER
The facts behind the filing of the present petition are as follows:
The Assistant Commissioner allowed the application filed by respondent No.5 herein under Section 5 of the
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12664 WP No. 19267 of 2025
Karnataka Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prohibition of Transfer of Certain Lands Act), 1978, by
order dated 11.07.2005. The petitioner herein filed an appeal before the Deputy Commissioner, Bengaluru District, in Appeal No.13/2011-12. The appeal was allowed while setting aside the order passed by the Assistant Commissioner. The respondent No.4 challenged the order passed by the Deputy Commissioner before this court in W.P. No.42727/2013 and the said writ petition was dismissed. However, in the intra-court writ appeal in W.A.No.4531/2015 the Division Bench allowed the appeal while remanding the matter back to the Deputy Commissioner for reconsideration. In this writ petition, the purchaser respondent No.4 before the Deputy Commissioner is seeking to quash an order passed by the Deputy Commissioner rejecting the application filed by the petitioner herein for adjournment.
2. On the previous occasion, this Court had noticed in the order dated 14.01.2026 that if no orders are obtained
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12664 WP No. 19267 of 2025
by the petitioner before the next date of hearing at the hands of the Division Bench in the review petition filed by the petitioner, this Court will be constrained to either vacate the interim order or dispose of the writ petition.
3. Today learned counsel for the petitioner once again submits that the Division Bench has directed notice to the respondents.
4. In the considered opinion of this Court, the relief sought for by the petitioner before this Court would touch upon the proceedings before the Division Bench. Appropriate orders if any, may be secured by the petitioner before the Hon'ble Division Bench.
5. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of.
Pending I.As. if any stand disposed of.
Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE
JT/- CT: JL