Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Ex. Petition No.1135 of 2026 in
CWP No.3294 of 2026
Decided on: 29.06.2026.
Rajeev Sharma
… Petitioner
Versus
HPSEBL and another
… Respondents
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 ____________________________________________________ _ For the petitioner : Mr. Vinod Chauhan, Advocate.
For the respondents : Mr. Rajesh Kashyap, Advocate, for
respondent No.1.
Mr. Vishwajeet Singh, Advocate, for
respondent No.2. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral)
Issue notice. M/s Rajesh Kashyap and Vishwajeet Singh, Advocates, accept notice on behalf of respondent No.1 and respondent No.2, respectively. Learned counsel for respondent No.2 submits that appropriate orders in terms of the judgment in issue shall positively be passed by the Authority concerned within a period of three weeks from today. His statement is taken on record.
2.
In view of the above, these proceedings are accordingly closed.
3.
For compliance, list on 27.07.2026.
(Ajay Mohan Goel)
Judge June 29, 2026 (Vinod)
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?