Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13398 (GAU)

SMTI MAUSUMI KHAUND DAS AND ANR v. ASHOK DAS AND 5 ORS.

I.A.(Civil)/216/2026 · 2026-08-30

Arun Dev Choudhury

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010017482026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/216/2026 1: SMTI MAUSUMI KHAUND DAS AND ANR W/O SHRI PARASH MONI DAS, R/O A.T. ROAD, VODAFONE BUILDING, OPPOSITE HAIBARGAON HIGH SCHOOL, DIST- NAGAON, ASSAM-782002 2: PARASH MONI DAS S/O LATE MATHURA DAS R/O A.T. ROAD VODAFONE BUILDING OPPOSITE HAIBARGAON HIGH SCHOOL DIST- NAGAON ASSAM-78200 VERSUS 1: ASHOK DAS AND 5 ORS. SON OF LATE MATHURA DAS, RESIDENT OF HAIBARGAON, P.O. HAIBARGAON, PIN- 782002, DISTRICT-NAGAON, ASSAM. 2:THE INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED, A GOVERNMENT OF INDIA ENTERPRISE REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT 1956 REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT INDIAN OIL BHAWAN ALI YAVAR JUNG MARG BANDRA (EAST) MUMBAI- 400051 3:THE MARKETING OFFICER INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED ASSAM OIL DIVISION INDIA 4:THE CHIEF DIVISIONAL RETAIL SALES MANAGER INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED EAST POINT TOWER BAMUNIMAIDAM GUWAHATI- 781021 DISTRICT- KAMRUP (M) ASSAM. 5:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER MORIGAON ASSAM. 6:SMTI. MOINA DAS W/O LATE GIRIN DAS R/O HAIBARGAON P.O. HAIBARGAON PIN-782002 DIST- NAGAON ASSAM Page No.# 2/2 For the Applicant(s) : Mr. S.P. Roy, Advocate. Ms. V. Rai, Advocate. For the Respondent(s) : Ms. U. Sharma, Junior Govt. Advocate, Assam. : Mr. A.C. Borbora, Sr. Advocate, assisted by Mr. M. Smith, Advocate for caveator. – B E F O R E – HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. ASHUTOSH KUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY 31.08.2026 (Ashutosh Kumar, CJ) For the reason of certain uncharitable remarks made in the interlocutory application regarding the conduct of 3(three) Lawyers, Mr. S.P. Roy, learned advocate for the applicants/appellants seeks permission to withdraw the afore-noted interlocutory application seeking condonation of delay of 49 days in preferring the connected appeal with the liberty to file a fresh application with correct grounds. Permission is granted. The interlocutory application is dismissed as withdrawn, with the liberty as aforesaid. JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Comparing Assistant