[2026:RJ-JP:30671] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11438/2026 CNR: RJHC020683052026 | URN: CRLMB / 21113U / 2026 Sareef Khan S/o Abdul Rajak @ Rajaal, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Jhantli, Police Station Sikri, District Deeg. (At Present Accused Is Confined In District Jail Deeg). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11439/2026 CNR: RJHC020682902026 | URN: CRLMB / 21114U / 2026 Abdul Rajak Alias Rajaal S/o Chahat @ Parbhu, Aged About 65 Years, R/o Jhantli, Police Station Sikri, District Deeg. (At Present Accused Is Confined In District Jail Deeg). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arafat Hussain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Naresh Gupta, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA Judgment / Order 06/08/2026 1. The present bail applications have been filed under Section 483 BNSS, 2023 against the orders dated 14.07.2026 & 10.07.2026 respectively, passed by learned Additional District and Sessions Judge Brijnagar, District Deeg, in Criminal Misc. Case (CIS) Nos.406/2026 and 397/2026 respectively, whereby the bail applications of the petitioners were rejected in connection with [2026:RJ-JP:30671] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-11438/2026] F.I.R. No.139/2025, Police Station Sikri, District Deeg for the offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 117(2), 118(2), 3(5) of the BNS, 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the challan in the case has already been filed and there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioners of having committed any offence of similar nature or any other nature in the past. Moreover, the conclusion of trial will take sufficiently long time and even the offences are triable by a Magistrate, therefore, he prays that the petitioners may be enlarged on bail as the accused are in custody since 02.07.2026. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application. However, he submits that as per the case diary there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioners of having committed any offence of similar nature or any other nature in the past. 4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 5. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and upon consideration of the submissions advanced, and particularly the fact that challan has been filed; all the offences are triable by Magistrate; the conclusion of trial is likely to take a considerable time; there are no criminal antecedents against the accused- petitioners of having committed any offence of similar nature or any other nature in past, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application deserves to be accepted. 6. Consequently, the bail applications are allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioners namely - (i) Sareef Khan [2026:RJ-JP:30671] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-11438/2026] S/o Abdul Rajak @ Rajaal and (ii) Abdul Rajak Alias Rajaal S/o Chahat @ Parbhu arrested in connection with F.I.R. No. 139/2025, Police Station Sikri, District deeg, shall be released on bail; provided each of them furnish a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/ (Rs. One Lakh Only) with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand Only) each, to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so till the completion of the trial and with additional following conditions: (i) The petitioners shall not leave country without the permission of the Court; (ii) The petitioners shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which they are accused, or suspected, of the commission of which they are suspected; and (iii) The petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (BIPIN GUPTA),J 82-83/KRATIKA