HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 35328 of 2026 Court No. - 68 (Sr. No. 64 of 278) HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Rohit Shukla, learned counsel for applicant, Sri Akal Raj, learned counsel for the informant and Sri Arun Kumar Mishra, learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. This is the second bail application on behalf of the applicant. The first one bail application was rejected by this Court vide orders dated 23.03.2026, passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.400 of 2026 respectively. 4. The present bail application has been filed by the applicant in Case Crime No. 631 of 2025, under Sections 70 (2), 351 (3), 115 (2) B.N.S. and Section 5 (g)/6 POCSO Act, Police Station Kotwali Padrauna, District Kushinagar with the prayer to enlarge him on bail. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant could not produce any new ground for pressing the instant bail application; as such, I do not find it a fit case for grant of bail to the applicant. The instant bail application is found devoid of merits and is, accordingly, rejected. 6. However, it is directed that the aforesaid case pending before the trial court be decided expeditiously, as early as possible, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the facts brought in by the parties pertaining to the disposal of bail application and the said observations shall have no bearing on the merits of the case during trial. October 5, 2026 Suraj Srivastav Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Amrita Kashyap, Rohit Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Akal Raj Singh, G.A. (Krishan Pahal,J.) Reyaz Ahmed .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- SURAJ SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad