Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13394 (GAU)

JAHNABEE SAIKIA v. NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY

I.A.(Crl.)/205/2026 · 2026-08-27

Kalyan Rai Surana, Manish Choudhury, Sanjay Kumar Medhi

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010040182026 2026:GAU-AS:12517-DB THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/205/2026 JAHNABEE SAIKIA D/O ANAND MOHAN DAS, R/O AMALAPATTY, WARD NO 7, P.O. AND P.S. SIVASAGAR. DIST. SIVASAGAR, ASSAM, PIN 785640 ,PH VERSUS NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY REPRESENTED BY SC, NIA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. B D KONWAR SR. ADV., MR. K GOGOI (AMICUS CURIAE),MRS J M KONWAR,MS. B SOREN,MR H AGARWAL,MR J SINGH Advocate for the Respondent : SC, NIA, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY ORDER Date : 28.08.2026 (K.R. Surana, J) Heard Mr. J. Singh, learned counsel for the applicant who submits that he has received instruction from the applicant to withdraw this appeal without Page No.# 2/2 prejudice to the right of the accused to pray for bail. Mr. R.K.D. Choudhury, learned Dy.SGI for the respondents and he has submitted a compilation of cases on the issue. The same is made a part of record. Mr. K. Gogoi, the learned Amicus Curiae has also submitted his views together with a compilation of case laws on which he intends to rely upon. The effort of the learned Amicus Curiae is appreciated. The said compilation is made a part of record. The issue raised in the connected reference shall be answered in a appropriate case. Accordingly, without prejudice to the right of the accused to pray for bail, this application stands dismissed on withdrawal. Consequently, the connected un-numbered appeal also stands dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant