Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13392 (MAD)

Poovarasan v. The State rep by

CRL OP/5877/2026 · 2026-03-06

M Nirmal Kumar

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP No. 5877 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 06-03-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M. NIRMAL KUMAR CRL OP No. 5877 of 2026 Poovarasan, S/o.Haridass, No.8/2, Anna Nagar Street, Kattukarani, Madurantakam, Chengalpattu District. Petitioner Vs 1.The State Rep by The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Madurantakam, Chengalpattu District. 2.The Inspector of Police, Achirapakkam Police Station, Chengalpattu District. Crime No.12/2026 3.Selvi, W/o.Selvaraj, Anna Nagar Street, Kattukarani, Madurantakam, Chengalpattu District. Respondent(s) PRAYER: The Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, praying to direct the learned Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases registered under SC/ST (POA) Act, Chengalpattu to consider the bail petition of the petitioner on the same day of his surrender in Crime No.12 of 2026 on the file of the second respondent herein. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 5877 of 2026 For Petitioner(s): Mr.Y.Indian For Mr.G.Mageshkumar For Respondents- 1 & 2 : Mr.Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam Additional Public Prosecutor ORDER The Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases registered under SC/ST (POA) Act, Chengalpattu to consider the bail petition of the petitioner on the same day of his surrender in Crime No.12 of 2026 on the file of the second respondent police. 2.The case of the prosecution is that on 12.01.2026, when the third respondent/defacto complainant’s husband and her relatives were talking in the street, the petitioner went there and abused them using their caste name. Hence, the complaint. 3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the petitioner and the defacto complainant were residing in the same area for quite some time knowing each other’s social status. The petitioner abused and threatened the defacto complainant’s husband and her relatives, who were standing in that area and asked them to move away. The petitioner also informed 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 5877 of 2026 that he has got some photographs of defacto complainant which he would publish in a social media and abused them using their caste name. 4.In view of the above factual position, there shall be a direction to the Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases registered under SC/ST (POA) Act, Chengalpattu, to consider the petitioner’s bail application, preferably on the same day of his surrender, in connection with Crime No.12 of 2026 on the file of the second respondent Police and to pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, after affording due opportunity to the victims under Section 15-A of the SC/ST (POA) Act, 1989. The petitioner shall surrender before the jurisdictional Court concerned within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5.Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition stands disposed of. 06.03.2026 Index : Yes/No Speaking order/Non-speaking order Neutral citation : Yes/No rsi 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 5877 of 2026 M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J. rsi To 1.The Special Judge, Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases registered under SC/ST (POA) Act, Chengalpattu. 2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Madurantakam, Chengalpattu District. 3.The Inspector of Police, Achirapakkam Police Station, Chengalpattu District. 4.The Public Prosecutor High Court, Madras. CRL OP No. 5877 of 2026 06.03.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis