NARAYAN SAHU v. DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
CRMP/776/2024 · 2026-02-12
Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13390 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13390 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2026:CGHC:8026
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 776 of 2024 Narayan Sahu S/o Mr. Hari Ram Sahu Aged About 43 Years Resident Of Village Hichchha Khatti, Dist. Mahasamund, C.G.
... Petitioner versus Directorate Of Enforcement Government of India Represented By Its Assistant Director, Shri R. Naresh, Directorate of Enforcement, Raipur Zonal Office, Raipur, C.G.
... Respondent (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Nikhil Parakh, Advocate For Respondent : Dr. Saurabh Kumar Pande, Advocate
Hon'ble Shri
Ramesh Sinha,
Chief Justice
Hon'ble
Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
, Judge
Order
on Board
Per
Ramesh Sinha
, Chief Justice
13.02.2026
1. Heard Mr. Nikhil Parakh, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Dr. Saurabh Kumar Pande, learned counsel appearing for the respondent.
2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- ANURADHA TIWARI Digitally signed by ANURADHA TIWARI Date: 2026.02.16 11:28:35 +0530
2
“It is, therefore, prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to exercise its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. and in exercise thereof call for the records, if necessary, admit the petition and after hearing parties in the matter quash the criminal complaint case/ charge sheet for implication of petitioner in the Complaint case no ECIR/RPZO/09/2022 filed by the respondent and/or pass such other orders in favor of the petitioner as this Hon'ble Court may deem it fit in the facts and circumstances of the case.”
3.
Learned counsel appearing for the sole respondent submits that the matter is sub-judice before the trial Court for framing of the charges.
4. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file afresh, if occasion arises.
5. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to take recourse to law, if the matter survives. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Anu