Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13384 (ALL)

SMT SHWETA AGARWAL v. STATE OF U.P. AND 12 OTHERS

WRIB/4514/2026 · 2026-10-06

Arun Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 4514 of 2026 Court No. - 51 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. The present petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent no. 2 - Board of Revenue, U.P., Lucknow to adjudicate/decide Revision No. 3495 of 2023 within a specific period as fixed by this Court. 3. Contention is that in view of the provisions contained in Rule 183(4) of the U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016, the revision itself ought to have been decided within six months from the date of its filing, however, till date it is pending. Submission is that the matter is being routinely adjourned without any justifiable reasons. 4. Having considered the prayer made on behalf of the petitioner and the considering the facts and circumstances, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent no. 2 to decide the aforementioned revision, in accordance with law, within a period of six months from the date of presentation of a certified copy of this order. October 7, 2026 Sartaj Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arpit Agarwal, Vibhanshu Dhar Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Sher Bahadur Singh (Arun Kumar,J.) Smt Shweta Agarwal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 12 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SARTAJ AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad