Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13380 (GAU)

SRI SUKLAL BARMAN v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

I.A.(Crl.)/884/2026 · 2026-08-30

Anjan Moni Kalita, Michael Zothankhuma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010181712026 2026:GAU-AS:12530-DB THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/884/2026 SRI SUKLAL BARMAN SON OF LATE BIPIN BARMAN, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DEOSUNGA UNDER GORESWAR POLICE STATION IN THE DISTRICT OF TAMULPUR, BTR, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE P.P. ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. U CHOUDHURY, Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Linked Case : ST.Rev./0/0 SRI SUKLAL BARMAN SON OF LATE BIPIN BARMAN RESIDENT OF VILLAGE DEOSUNGA UNDER GORESWAR POLICE STATION IN THE District OF TAMULPUR BTR, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY P.P. ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : UJJAL CHOUDHURY Advocate for : appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJAN MONI KALITA ORDER Date : 31.08.2026 (M. Zothankhuma, J) Heard Mr. U. Choudhury, learned counsel for the applicant, who submits that there is a delay of 278 days in filing the appeal against the conviction under Section 302 IPC. Mr. R. R. Kaushik, learned Addl. PP submits that he has got no objection to the delay being condoned. Accordingly, the delay of 278 days is condoned. Registry to register the connected appeal and list the same accordingly. The IA is accordingly disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant