(2026:JHHC:14921) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 4099 of 2026 Tausim Khan @ Tausif Khan, aged about 23 years old son of Guddu Khan, resident of village Bishunpur, PO & PS – Nagar Untari, District – Garhwa. … … …Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand. … … …Opp. Party ------ For the Petitioner : Ms. Sabyasanchi, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sushma Aind, Addl. P.P. ------ HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ Order No:- 03, Dated:- 14th May, 2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved before this Court for grant of bail in connection with Nagar Untari P.S. Case No. 239 of 2024 corresponding to S.T. No. 241 of 2025, registered for the offences punishable under sections 103(1), 109, 61(2) of the B.N.S. along with Section 27 of the Arms Act. This is the second journey of the petitioner with the prayer for grant of regular bail as earlier, the prayer of the petitioner for grant of regular bail was rejected vide order dated 04.09.2025 passed in B.A. No. 6932 of 2026. It is next submitted that the fresh ground is that in the meanwhile, nine witnesses have been examined by the prosecution including the informant. It is next submitted that though the informant has not supported the case of the prosecution and besides the informant, and P.W. 2, P.W. 3, P.W.4 and P.W. 9 have also not supported the case of the prosecution and even though the prosecution put leading questions to them, still they did not support the case of the prosecution. It is next submitted that the rest of the witnesses have also not stated anything to implicate the petitioner in this case. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and the petitioner has been in custody since 09.05.2025, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 13 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the co-accused person with similar allegation has already been admitted to bail. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the abovenamed petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge – I, Nagar Untari Garhwa, in connection with Nagar Untari P.S. Case No. 239 of 2024 corresponding to S.T. No. 241 of 2025, with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated – 14.05.2026 Aditi