Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13373 (JHR)

PARSHURAM PASWAN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./2247/2026 · 2026-05-06

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[ 2026:JHHC:13494] -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2247 of 2026 Parshuram Paswan, aged 30 years, S/o Ashok Paswan, resident of Village and P.O. Rohila, P.S. Ramna, District Garhwa, Jharkhand. ..... … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ..... … Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ------ For the Petitioner : Ms. Priya Saw, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Shweta Singh, A.P.P. ------ 05/ 06.05.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Garhwa P.S. Case No. 87 of 2026, registered for the offence under Sections 69, 352 and 351(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending in the court of learned C.J.M., Garhwa. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case, alleging therein that the petitioner has established physical relationship with the informant on the false pretext of marriage. She next submits that what has been done that was consensual in nature and in the FIR, it has been stated that the petitioner and the informant were in relationship two years prior to the lodging of the present FIR and the FIR has only been lodged on 05.02.2026. On these grounds, she submits that anticipatory bail may kindly be provided to the petitioner. 4. Learned A.P.P. appearing for the State has opposed the prayer and submits that the allegations are there of establishing physical relation with the informant on the false pretext of marriage. [ 2026:JHHC:13494] -2- On this ground, he submits that anticipatory bail may kindly be rejected. 5. Looking into the contents of the FIR itself, it transpires that it has been stated that the petitioner and the informant were in relationship two years prior to lodging of the FIR and in the FIR it has also been stated that they have met several times at different places, which prima facie suggests that what has happened that was consensual in nature. In the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the above-named petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today and in the event of her arrest or surrender, he shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Garhwa, in connection with Garhwa P.S. Case No. 87 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated:-06.05.2026 Amitesh/-