Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1337 (ALL)

MUNNA LAL v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/7282/2026 · 2026-05-13

Dinesh Pathak

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 7282 of 2026 Court No. - 33 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel representing State-respondents and perused the record on board. 2. This writ petition has been filed, inter alia, seeking the following reliefs: "a. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of writ of mandamus commanding the Respondent No.-3 to pay the outstanding/ rest of amount of Rs.-4,08,391.00 retrial benefits as earliest within stipulated period as fixed by this Hon'ble Court with 8% interest per annum, b. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of writ of mandamus commanding the Respondent No.-3 to consider and decide the representation dated 15.12.2025 and 26.02.2026 moved by the petitioner before him expeditiously within stipulated period as fixed by this Hon'ble Court." 3. Learned counsel for the respondents has contended that the grievance of the present petitioner can be more appropriately redressed by the Executive Officer, Nagar Panchayat Kurawali (respondent No. 3), and he has no objection, in case, a direction is issued for expeditious disposal of a fresh representation to be moved by the petitioners within such stipulated period as may be directed by this Court. 4. In this conspectus, as above, no useful purpose would be served by keeping this matter pending. Therefore, this Court deems it appropriate to finally dispose of the present writ petition, without making any Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Narendra Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohd. Ishraque Farooqui Munna Lal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) observation on the merits of the case, with liberty to the petitioners to move a fresh representation before the Executive Officer, Nagar Panchayat Kurawali (respondent No. 3), to ventilate his grievance, as averred in the present writ petition, within a period of three weeks from today, along with a certified copy of this order and a self attested copy of the present writ petition, and, in turn, he shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably, within a period of two months from the date of production of such representation. 5. With the aforesaid observation, present writ petition is disposed of. May 14, 2026 vinay WRIA No. 7282 of 2026 2 (Dinesh Pathak,J.) Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad