Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13369 (AP)

Chejarla Suresh Reddy v. Sri. S. SURESH KUMAR

CC/3968/2025 · 2026-10-13

Harinath N

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010665632025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY, THE 14th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3968/2025 Between: 1. CHEJARLA SURESH REDDY,, S/O. VENKATA RAMANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, OCC CONTRACTOR, R/O. D.NO. 2/506, RAMAKRISHNA NAGAR, NAWABPET, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE- 524004. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI S SURESH KUMAR, WORKING AS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY MA AND UD DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS, WORKING AS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. SRI SRI HIMANSHU SHUKLA IAS, WORKING AS DISTRICT COLLECTOR, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT 4. SRI Y O NANDAN, WORKING AS NELLORE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION REP. BY ITS MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 5. SRI P V ANIL KUMAR, WORKING AS EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the Respondents herein under sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Court Act, 1971 for willfully and disobedience of the Orders passed by Hon'ble Court in WP No. 17947 of 2024, dated. 02.09.2025 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SHAIK MEERAVALI Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. A S C BOSE (SC FOR MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS AP) 2. SREEKANTH REDDY AMBATI The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE No.3968 OF 2025 ORDER: 1. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.17947 of 2024, dated 02.09.2025 has been complied with and as such no further orders are necessary in this Contempt Case. 2. In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, nothing would further survive for consideration in this contempt case. 3. Recording the same, the present Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date : 14.10.2026 KGM 33 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE No.3968 of 2025 Date: 14.10.2026 KGM