1 2026:HHC:25123 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 736 of 2026 Decided on: 29.06.2026 ________________________________________________ Vikas Chaiudhary ....Petitioner Versus Rakesh Kanwar & Anr. …Respondents _ Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Naresh Kaul, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General. Sushil Kukreja, Judge (oral) Learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record communication dated 23.06.2026 along with copy of Office Order dated 22.06.2026, wherein, it has been stated as under:- “In this regard, it is submitted that in compliance to the order/judgement dated 12.12.2025 passed in CWP No.19535/2025, it is submitted that the representation of the petitioner has been considered and decided by the respondent Department by way of passing Office Order dated 22.06.2026.” 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2026:HHC:25123 2. Since judgment under reference stands duly complied with, therefore, no further orders are required to be passed in the present contempt petition and the matter is closed. 3. However, if the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to assail office order dated 22.06.2026, in accordance with law. 4. The petition is disposed of, so also pending application(s), if any. ( Sushil Kukreja ) 29th June, 2026 Judge (Kiran)