SARTHAK SINGH AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS
WRIC/23927/2026 · 2026-10-07
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13368 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13368 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 23927 of 2026 Court No. - 36 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J.
1. None appears on behalf of petitioners to press this writ petition.
2. Even on last date of listing, learned counsel for petitioner was not present.
3. It appears that petitioners and his advocate are not diligent to pursue their case. Otherwise also, Court finds that prayer made in this writ petition is defective and documents annexed are also illegible.
4. Therefore, writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution with a cost of Rs. 10,000/- which will be deposited in High Court Legal Services Committee within two weeks.
5. Registry will accept restoration application only when a copy of receipt of cost is annexed/produced along with said application.
6. A copy of this order be sent to petitioner on his given address through Registrar (Compliance).
7. This order is passed in presence of S/Sri Achal Singh and N.L. Maurya, learned advocates for State-respondents. October 8, 2026 N. Sinha Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Chandra Shekhar Agnihotri Counsel for Respondent(s) : Achal Singh, C.S.C. (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.) Sarthak Singh And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NIRMAL SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad