Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13364 (MAD)

Rajadurai @ Jeniraj v. The State Rep. by The Inspector of Police

CRL OP/5801/2026 · 2026-03-06

C Kumarappan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP No. 5801 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 06-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL OP No. 5801 of 2026 Rajadurai @ Jeniraj S/o.Murthi, No. 161/157, Ambethkar Nagar, Mambakkam, Tiruvallur 602 026. ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State represented by: The Inspector of Police Periyapalayam Police Station, Thiruvallur. Crime No. 20/2026. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: The Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the above Cr.No. 20/2026 on the file of the respondent police and thus render justice. For Petitioner(s): Mr. B.Shakthivel For Respondent(s): Mr. S. Vinoth Kumar, Government Advocate (Criminal side). ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 20.01.2026 for the alleged offences under Sections 309(5) of B.N.S. in Crime https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 5801 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 No.20 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other accused unlawfully assembled with deadly weapons in order to commit dacoity. Hence the case. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He would further submit that the petitioner has been implicated in this case only based on the confession of the co-accused and he is ready and willing to abide by any condition that may be imposed by this Court and hence prayed to grant bail to the petitioner. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) strongly objected to enlarge the petitioner on bail on the ground that there are 7 other previous cases pending against the petitioner. 5. From the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate, it appears that the petitioner has been incarcerated since 20.01.2026. Though the petitioner has been under judicial custody for the past past nearly 45 days, considering the fact that there are 7 previous cases, as rightly contended by the learned Government Advocate, if the petitioner is enlarged on bail, it would https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 5801 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 cause fear psychosis among the public at large. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 06-03-2026 MJS Note: 1. Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court. 2. All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. To 1.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. 2. The Inspector Of Police, Periyapalayam Police Station, Thiruvallur. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 5801 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. MJS CRL OP No. 5801 of 2026 06-03-2026 . https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis