IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23480 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-225 Year-2025 Thana- BHARGAMA District- Araria ====================================================== 1. Jamshed S/o Late Shahadat Resident of village- Akarthapa, ward no. 8, P.S.- Bhargama, Dist.- Araria 2. Abdur Rahman @ Lalo @ Md. Rahman S/o Late Shahadat Resident of village- Akarthapa, ward no. 8, P.S.- Bhargama, Dist.- Araria 3. Sabir S/o Late Hasruddin Resident of village- Akarthapa, ward no. 8, P.S.- Bhargama, Dist.- Araria 4. Bakib S/o Sabir Resident of village- Akarthapa, ward no. 8, P.S.- Bhargama, Dist.- Araria 5. Toukir S/o Late Imaruddin Resident of village- Akarthapa, ward no. 8, P.S.- Bhargama, Dist.- Araria 6. Jainuddin S/o Atabul Resident of village- Akarthapa, ward no. 8, P.S.- Bhargama, Dist.- Araria 7. Arafat S/o Atabul Resident of village- Akarthapa, ward no. 8, P.S.- Bhargama, Dist.- Araria 8. Rahim S/o Late Hadis Resident of village- Akarthapa, ward no. 8, P.S.- Bhargama, Dist.- Araria 9. Imtiyaz S/o Late Hadis Resident of village- Akarthapa, ward no. 8, P.S.- Bhargama, Dist.- Araria ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Krishna Pd. Singh, Sr. Advocate Mr.Ramesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr.Nand Kishore Prasad, APP For the Informant : Mr.Navjot Yeshu, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 3 08-05-2026 Heard Mr. Krishna Pd. Singh, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners; learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant. 2. The petitioners apprehend arrest in connection Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23480 of 2026(3) dt.08-05-2026 2/2 with Bhargama P.S. Case No. 225 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2),118(1), 109, 103(1), 303(2), 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act. 3. The petitioners and others are accused of killing the deceased. There is specific allegation of giving a fatal blow against one Md. Azam. The petitioners are the member of the mob and they were trying to capture the land. 4. I have heard and considered the submissions of the parties, since the petitioners were the member of mob and were trying to capture the land, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 5. Accordingly, this application stands dismissed. tusharika/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T