Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13362 (GAU)

CHANDANA PAUL v. BADAL BISWAKARMA AND 2 ORS.

I.A.(Civil)/3030/2026 · 2026-08-30

Parthivjyoti Saikia

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010184752026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3030/2026 CHANDANA PAUL W/O. SHANKAR PAUL, R/O. BHANGA MANDIR BORSALA, P/S. DHEKIAJULI, P/O. BORSALA, DIST. SONITPUR, ASSAM VERSUS BADAL BISWAKARMA AND 2 ORS. S/O. LATE ROTY BISWAKARMA, R/O. VILL. JULIA TEA ESTATE, DHEKIAJULI, DIST. SONITPUR, ASSAM 2:KAMAL KUMAR PAUL S/O. NONI GOPAL PAUL R/O. WARD NO 5 SANTIPUR P/O. BISWANATH CHARIALI P/S. BISWANATH CHARIALI DIST. SONITPUR ASSAM 3:HDFC ERGO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED ADITYAN BUILDING 6TH FLOOR G.S ROAD LACHIT NAGAR GHY 781007 ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. SURAJIT DAS, MR. SAHIL AHMED,MR. RITUPAM MALI,A MISHRA Advocate for the Respondent : , Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA ORDER 31.08.2026 Heard Mr. A Mishra, learned counsel appearing for the applicant. This is an application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act praying for condonation of delay of 8 (eight) days in preferring the connected appeal. The delay has been satisfactorily explained. This court is of the opinion that going for issuing notice to the respondents would be nothing but sheer waste of time. Therefore, the delay is condoned. Registry shall register the appeal and list the same for admission hearing. The interlocutory application is disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant