[2026:RJ-JP:31379] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Misc. Suspension of Sentence Application No.1360/2026 In S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 1483/2026 CNR: RJHC020575412026 | URN: CRLAS / 2632U / 2026 Tarif Son Of Sabdin, Resident Of Mirjapur Police Station Kishangarhbas District Alwar. At Present In Central Jail, Alwar. ----Appellant Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through The P.P. ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Misc. Suspension Of Sentence Application (Appeal) No. 1088/2026 CNR: RJHC020492372026 | URN: SOSA / 2013U / 2026 In S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No.1159/2026 Mubeen Son Of Ibrahim, Resident Of Village Rigar, Tehsil Firozepur, Police Station Firozepur, District Nuh Haryana. (At Present Confined In District Jail, Alwar) ----Appellant Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Appellant(s) : Mr. Harendra Singh Mr. Mohd Shakir Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Kumar Saini, PP with Mr. Navdeep Singh, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI Order 10/08/2026 Instant applications for suspension of sentence have been preferred on behalf of the applicant-appellants under Section 430 [2026:RJ-JP:31379] (2 of 3) [SOSA-1360/2026] of B.N.S.S. alongwith the appeals, to suspend the sentence awarded by the Special Court of learned Additional District & Sessions Judge, No.3 Alwar, Rajasthan vide its judgment dated 15.05.2026 in Sessions Case No.70/2024, whereby the applicant- appellants were convicted for the alleged offence(s) & sentenced to undergo maximum period of seven years rigorous imprisonment with fine. Learned counsel appearing for both the applicant-appellants submits that the applicants remained for some time in judicial custody during trial, subsequently, enlarged on bail, and, presently, they are behind the bars since the date of judgment i.e. 15.05.2026. Counsel further submits that the learned Trial Court has not appreciated the facts & circumstances of the case holistically and hearing of these appeals will take their own time, hence, the sentences awarded to the applicant-appellants may be suspended during pendency of the appeals. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the submissions made herein-above. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material made available on record. Taking into consideration the term of sentence & the submissions made at bar and without commenting upon the merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to suspend the sentences awarded to the applicant-appellants during pendency of these appeals. Accordingly, the applications for suspension of sentence are allowed and it is, hereby, ordered that the execution of sentences [2026:RJ-JP:31379] (3 of 3) [SOSA-1360/2026] awarded to accused-applicants, namely Tarif Son Of Sabdin & Mubeen Son Of Ibrahim, by the learned Trial Court(s) shall remain suspended during pendency of the appeals, provided each of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- together with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each, to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before this Court on 10.09.2026 and thereafter, as and when they are called upon to do so. (VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J 28-29/SAURABH