MAYANK KANT KAKRAN AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
A227/2960/2019 · 2026-10-04
Vikram D Chauhan
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13359 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13359 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 2960 of 2019 Court No. - 55 HON'BLE VIKRAM D. CHAUHAN, J.
1. List has been revised. None appears on behalf of the petitioner.
2. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
3. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. October 5, 2026 Junaid Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mandvi Tripathi, Santosh Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Vikram D. Chauhan,J.) Mayank Kant Kakran And 3 Others .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- JUNAID AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad