SHAHEEN AKTHAR W/O LATE SHRI TUFEIL AHMED v. ARUN KUMAR HASIZA
CCP/1224/2024 · 2026-08-05
Ganesh Ram Meena
Contempt Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13358 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13358 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:30608] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 1224/2024 CNR: RJHC021078932024 | URN: CCP / 1317U / 2024 Shaheen Akthar W/o Late Shri Tufeil Ahmed, Aged About 80 Years, Resident Of 4597, Sanjay Market, Jaipur District Jaipur (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus
1. Arun Kumar Hasiza, Commissioner Municipal Corporation (Heritage) Jaipur, Jalebi Chowk, Jaipur, District Jaipur.
2. Sudhansh Pant, Chief Secretary Rajasthan Government The State Of Rajasthan Through Secretariat C-Scheme, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None For Respondent(s) : None HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 05/08/2026
1. This contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging non-compliance of order dated 29.01.2024.
2. No one is present on behalf of the petitioner.
3. By the order dated 29.01.2024, the Court disposed off the writ petition with a direction to the respondents to decide the pending representation of the petitioner strictly in accordance with law expeditiously as early as possible and preferably within a period of four months from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order.
4. The respondents have filed the reply and stated that the representation of the petitioner has been considered and rejected
[2026:RJ-JP:30608] (2 of 2) [CCP-1224/2024] vide order dated 11.02.2025. The copy of order dated 11.02.2025 has also been placed on record as Annexure-R-1.
5. In view of the fact that representation of the petitioner has been considered and decided by the respondents vide order dated 11.02.2025 (Annexure-R-1), this Court is of the opinion that the respondents have complied the order/direction given vide order dated 29.01.2024.
6. Accordingly, this contempt petition is disposed.
7. Pending application/s, if any, also stand/s disposed.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J Gaurav Srivastava/111