AMJAD AHMAD v. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ORS
W.P.(C)/10077/2026 · 2026-07-24
Amit Bansal
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13349 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13349 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
W.P.(C) 10077/2026 $~40 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 10077/2026 & CM APPL. 46876/2026 AMJAD AHMAD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Baban Kumar Sharma and Mohd. Babar, Advocates. versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vinod Khanna, Advocate for R- 1/MCD. Mr. Rishabh Sahu, SPC with Mr. Sameer Sharma, Advocate for R- 2/SHO. Mr. Faisal Naseem, Mr. Jitender Choudhary and Mr. Krishan Pal Baisoya, Advocates for R-3 to 5. CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL O R D E R % 24.07.2026
1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent/MCD to stop the ongoing illegal and unauthorised construction being carried out by the respondents no.4 and 5 at property bearing no.4853- 55, Phatak Namak, Hauz Qazi, Delhi-110006 measuring 125 sq. yds (hereinafter the ‘subject property’). 2. It is stated that the petitioner resides in the property adjoining the subject property. Due to the aforesaid unauthorised construction, cracks have emerged on the walls of the petitioner’s house. It is further stated that This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/07/2026 at 15:33:41
W.P.(C) 10077/2026 the easementary rights of the petitioner, including the right of ventilation, fresh air, ingress and egress, are being violated. 3. Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent/MCD submits that there is no construction going on in the subject property. The owner/occupier of the subject property has carried out demolition of portions of the said property. 4. Even though photographs have been filed along with the writ petition, the same do not show any unauthorised construction going on in the subject property. 5. Counsel appearing on behalf of the private respondents no.4 and 5 submits that the present writ petition has been filed on account of a private dispute between the petitioner and the respondents no.4 and 5. He further submits that no construction is going on in the subject property. 6. In view thereof, this Court does not find any merit in the present writ petition and the same is dismissed. 7. Needless to state, the petitioner shall have the right to invoke appropriate remedies in law in the event any unauthorised construction takes place. 8.
All rights, contentions and legal remedies of the owner/occupier/ private respondents shall remain protected. AMIT BANSAL, J JULY 24, 2026 Rzu This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/07/2026 at 15:33:41