Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13347 (RAJ)

SANDHYA BHAGORA D/O TULSIRAM MEENA v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/19628/2025 · 2026-08-07

Anuroop Singhi

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:31085] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19628/2025 CNR: RJHC021098262025 | URN: CW / 43834U / 2025 Sandhya Bhagora D/o Tulsiram Meena, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Uthel, Post Office Unthel, District Pratapgarh, Rajasthan - 312619. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Department Of Panchayati Raj And Rural Development, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. The Director, Directorate Of Elementary Education, Bikaner, (Raj.) 3. The Secretary, Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, State Institute Of Agriculture Management Premises, Sitabari, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan 302018, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Harendar Neel Mr. Amogh Gupta Mr. Rohan Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Prateek Saxena with Ms. Anshul Ranga for Mr. Kapil Prakash Mathur, AAG Mr. Jitendra K. Takar and Mr. Ritika Naruka for Mr. S.S. Naruka, AAG Mr. Manish Bhardwaj for Mr. Nalin G. Narain HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUROOP SINGHI Order 07/08/2026 1. Learned counsel for both the parties are ad idem that the controversy involved in the present writ petition stands duly covered by the order dated 11.05.2026 passed by this Court at [2026:RJ-JP:31085] (2 of 2) [CW-19628/2025] Principal Seat Jodhpur in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.21136/2025 titled as Minakshi Pargi Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. along with other connected matters, wherein following order was passed:- "1. These writ petitions are disposed of in following terms as agreed and requested by the learned counsels for the respective parties:- (i) The order impugned dated 28.11.2025 is quashed and set aside qua the petitioners with all consequences to follow. (ii) However, the respondents are at liberty to pass an order afresh in respect of subject matter of the order impugned dated 28.11.2025 following the principles of natural justice." 2. In view of the said agreed and undisputed facts, the impugned order dated 28.11.2025 (Annexure-7) in the present writ petition is quashed and set aside qua the petitioner with all consequences to follow. 3. However, the respondents will be at liberty to pass an order afresh in respect of the subject matter of the order impugned dated 28.11.2025 after duly following the principles of natural justice. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. 5. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (ANUROOP SINGHI),J JAYANT KUMAR /31