Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 ( 2026:HHC:25122 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No.1092 of 2025 Date of Decision: 29.06.2026 ___________________________________________________ Bhagat Ram ....Petitioner Versus Jatin Lal and others …Respondents ___________________________________________________ Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 ________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Abhishek Nagta, Advocate, vice Mr. Mohit Jaitak, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.1 & 2. Mr. Sanjeev Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.3. ________________________________________________ Sushil Kukreja, Judge (Oral) At this stage, learned vice counsel for the petitioner, under instructions received from Mr. Mohit Jaitak, Advocate, states that the judgment under reference has been duly complied with and he may be permitted to withdraw the contempt petition. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2 ( 2026:HHC:25122 )
2. Therefore, in view of the submission made by learned vice counsel for the petitioner, the instant contempt petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( Sushil Kukreja ) June 29, 2026 Judge (V.Himalvi)