- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9583 WP No. 2560 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 2560 OF 2026 (LA-UDA) BETWEEN: 1. SRI MALLAPPA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, S/O LATE MALLIKARJUNAIAH. 2. SRI.MADAPPA AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, S/O LATE MALLIKARJUNAIAH. 3. SRI.SHIVANNA AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, S/O LATE MALLIKARJUNAIAH, PETITIOENRS NoS.1 TO 3 ARE R/AT SATHGALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, MYSURU TALUK AND DISTRICT-570 019. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. P NATARAJU.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER MYSURU URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, (MYSURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY) MYSURU-570 001. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. G M ANAND, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9583 WP No. 2560 of 2026 THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO-DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO CONSIDER THE APPLICATION DATED 16.10.2025 VIDE ANNX-E AND TO PASS THE APPROPRIATE ORDER IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV ORAL ORDER The petitioner has sought issuance of an appropriate writ directing the respondent to consider representation dated 16.10.2025 at Annexure-E, and for passing of appropriate orders by the authority. The representation dated 16.10.2025 is to the effect that petitioner has sought for re-fixing the compensation by invoking power under Section 28-A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. 2. It is submitted that though compensation has been paid after taking note of compensation fixed as regards the similarly placed persons, however, interest on the compensation of 15% till the date of payment has not been made good. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9583 WP No. 2560 of 2026 3. Sri G.M. Anand, learned counsel for the respondent, submits that, the representation at Annexure- E would be considered within a period of two (2) months from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order and such consideration will be in accordance with law. 4. In light of the same, the petition is disposed of as not calling for adjudication, while taking note of the undertaking made on behalf of the respondent. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE HR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 30