2026:JHHC:14662 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 3299 of 2026 Ainul Ansari, aged about 33 years, Son of Shamshul Ansari @ Samasul Hake … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner :Mr. Peeyush Krishna Choudhary, Advocate : Mr. Manoj Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opp. Party-State : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sinha, Advocate --- 03/13.05.2026 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 31.01.2026 in connection with Thakurgangti P.S. Case No. 0003 of 2026 arising out of P.C.R. Case No. 717 of 2025, for the alleged offence registered under Sections 69, 115(2), 190, 3(5), 323, 351(2), 351(3), 352 of the BNS, 2023 pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Godda. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner as well as the victim are major and there is an allegation that in the year 2023, the petitioner forcefully made physical relation with the victim and he promised to marry the victim and subsequently, the victim became pregnant. The victim was taken to Kolkata and there the petitioner and the victim lived as husband and wife. The victim gave birth to a child and there was also a panchayat where the petitioner assured to perform marry the victim, but ultimately he did not marry and victim was thrown out from the house with the child on 23.09.2025. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party-State has opposed the prayer for bail and has submitted that the first incident is of the year 2023 reveals that there was forceful physical relationship established by the petitioner with the victim. 2026:JHHC:14662 2 5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the direct allegation made against the petitioner of forceful physical relationship in the year 2023 itself and subsequently he continued to exploit the victim on the pretext of marriage, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 6. The instant bail application is accordingly rejected. 7. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the court concerned through ‘FAX/E-mail’. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) 13.05.2026 Rakesh/- Uploaded on:-14.05.2026