Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13342 (MAD)

P.Senthil Kumar v. The District Collector

WP/8577/2026 · 2026-03-09

G Arul Murugan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.No.8577 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09.03.2026 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN W.P.No.8577 of 2026 & W.M.P.No.9997 of 2026 P.Senthil Kumar S/o Ponnusamy (Late) Nallarankadu, Opp To Naranampalayam Kottagoundampatti Village Omalur Taluk Salem District - 636 011. Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector Salem Salem District. 2. The Senior District Administrator Tasmac Limited Salem Salem District. 3. The District Manager Cum Sub Collector Mettur, Mettur Taluk Salem District. _ _________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.8577 of 2026 4. The Special Tahsildar Social Security Scheme Salem District. 5. The Inspector of Police Karruppur Police station Omalur Taluk Salem District. Respondent(s) Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents not to relocate the TASMAC shop bearing No. MN7TN44 into the proposed place in survey No.17/4 at Nallarankadu on the Service Road to Bangalore National Highway by considering the petitioner’s representation dated 05.12.2025. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Elango For Respondents : Mr.K.Karthik Jagannath Government Advocate for Respondents 1 & 4 Mr.K.M.D.Muhilan Additional Public Prosecutor for Respondent-5 Mr.M.Sekar Standing Counsel for Respondents 2 & 3 _ _________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.8577 of 2026 ORDER (Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) The present writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking direction to the respondents not to re- locate the TASMAC shop bearing No.MN7TN44 to the proposed place in survey No.17/4 at Nallarankadu, on the Service Road to Bangalore National Highway. 2. Learned Government Advocate appearing for respondents 1 and 4 has produced the proceedings of the District Collector dated 27.02.2026 granting permission to re-locate the shop to the aforesaid place. He submits that there is provision of appeal under Rule 9A of the Tamil Nadu Liquor Retail Vending (in Shops and Bars) Rules, 2003. 3. In view of the efficacious alternative remedy of appeal available to the petitioner, we are not inclined to entertain the writ petition. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to avail the remedy of appeal in accordance with law. _ _________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.8577 of 2026 4. With the aforesaid liberty, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the interim application is closed. (SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI,CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J) 09.03.2026 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No kpl To 1. The District Collector Salem Salem District. 2. The Senior District Administrator Tasmac Limited Salem Salem District. 3. The District Manager Cum Sub Collector Mettur, Mettur Taluk Salem District. _ _________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.8577 of 2026 4. The Special Tahsildar Social Security Scheme Salem District. 5. The Inspector of Police Karruppur Police station Omalur Taluk Salem District. _ _________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.8577 of 2026 THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND G.ARUL MURUGAN,J. (kpl) W.P.No.8577 of 2026 09.03.2026 _ _________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis