Page No.# 1/4 GAHC040014322026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : IA(C)/201/2026 Kabak Tamo Son of Shri Kabak Taka, resident of F Sector, Naharlagun, PO and PS Naharlagun, Papum Pare District, Arunachal Pradesh. VERSUS The Union of India and Anr represented by the Secretary, Govt of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, North Block, New Delhi 110001 2:The Directorate of Enforcement Age: 0 Occupation : through its Deputy Director Guwahati Zonal Office-1 6th Floor Mainaak Tower Shree Nagar Christian Basti Guwahati Kamrup 781000 3:The Assistant Director Age: 0 Occupation : Enforcement Directorate Itanagar Sub Zonal Office Senior Officers Apartment Tower-01 Flat No.18 5th Floor Zoo Road a Itanagar Arunachal Pradesh Advocate for the Petitioner : Geken Jini, Page No.# 2/4 Advocate for the Respondent : Marto Kato, DSGI Linked Case : WP(C)/412/2026 Kabak Tamo Age: 30 Occupation : Address:Son of Shri Kabak Taka resident of F Sector Naharlagun PO and PS naharlagun Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh. VERSUS The Union of India and 2 Ors Age: 0 Occupation : Address:represented by the Secretary Govt of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue North Block New Delhi 110001 2:The Directorate of Enforcement Age: 0 Occupation : Address:through its Deputy Director Guwahati Zonal Office-1 6th Floor Mainaak Tower Shree Nagar Christian Basti Guwahati Kamrup 781000 3:The Assistant Director Age: 0 Occupation : Address:Enforcement Directorate Itanagar Sub Zonal Office Senior Officers Apartment Page No.# 3/4 Tower-01 Flat No.18 5th Floor Zoo Road a Itanagar Arunachal Pradesh. ------------ Advocate for : Geken Jini Advocate for : Marto Kato appearing for The Union of India and 2 Ors: Advocate , , appearing for 2, 3, respectively. Page No.# 4/4 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI ORDER Date : 31.08.2026 Heard Shri G. Jini, learned counsel for the applicant, who by means of this application, has prayed for amendment in the connected writ petition, WP(C) 412/2026. It is submitted that, inadvertently, the interim prayer has been left out in the connected writ petition. Also heard Shri K. Loya, learned CGC for the respondents, who has, however, submitted that the interim prayer would amount to the final prayer. Be that as it may, in the interest of justice, the I.A. stands allowed by permitting the applicant to amend the connected writ petition by incorporating the interim prayer. Learned counsel for the applicant/petitioner is, accordingly, required to file the amended writ petition within a period of one week from today. The writ petition may be listed immediately thereafter. Accordingly, the I.A. stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant