[2026:RJ-JP:30939] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Third Bail Application No. 11153/2026 CNR: RJHC020666032026 | URN: CRLMB / 20633U / 2026 Mukesh S/o Heeralal, R/o Khedi, Police Station Chipabarod, Distt. Baran, Rajasthan. (Petitioner In Sub Jail Chhabara). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Shazadi Bano for Mr. Ali Mohammed Khan For Respondent(s) : Ms. Aarti Sharma, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 07/08/2026 1. This third bail application has been filed by the accused-petitioner under Section 483 of B.N.S.S., 2023 in connection with F.I.R. No.246/2025 registered with the Police Station Chhipabarod, District Baran, for offence punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 109(1), 351(2), 351(3) and 3(5) of B.N.S., 2023. 2. The first bail application bearing S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.532/2026 was dismissed as withdrawn by this Court vide order dated 06.04.2026. 3. The second bail application bearing S.B. Criminal Misc. Second Bail Application No.7833/2026 was dismissed as withdrawn by this Court vide order dated 26.05.2026 with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh bail application after examination of [2026:RJ-JP:30939] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-11153/2026] the Medical jurist, who prepared the medical report of the injured ‘Devraj’. 4. The learned counsel appearing for the accused- petitioner submits that the incident is of 21.07.2025 and the Medico Legal Report (for short ‘MLR’) of the injured- Devraj has been prepared on 13.08.2025 after about 22 days. He further submits that there is said to be a recovery of a country made gun and the same has been sent for FSL report after two months of the recovery. He further submits that as per the prosecution story, the injured was firstly taken to the hospital at Chhabra, but the Doctor, who gave First Aid to the injured, has not been made witness from the prosecution side so that he can explain whether the injured has sustained bullet injury or not. He also submits that the Doctor who has prepared the MLR has also been examined and has stated that no bullet was recovered from the body of the injured when the MLR was prepared and also opined the injury dangerous to life on the basis of treatment record of the injured. He further submits that the accused-petitioner is said to have been in custody since 25.07.2025 and out of 19 prosecution witnesses, only eight have been examined so far. He further submits that co-accused Ranveer has already been enlarged on bail by the Court. 5. The learned Public Prosecutor has opposed this third bail application and submits that as per the evidence on record and the statements of the witnesses recorded so far, the allegation against the petitioner is of inflicting gun shot injury to the injured- Devraj and the said injury has been opined to be dangerous to life. [2026:RJ-JP:30939] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-11153/2026] 6. Considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material made available on record, including the statement of the prosecution witnesses examined so far and also of the Medical Officer, who prepared the MLR of the injured- Devraj. 7. The injured- Devraj has been examined as PW-3. During his examination, he has stated that the accused-petitioner- Mukesh, Ranveer and Veer Meena made fire and he sustained gun shot injury. In the statement, the material witnesses Ranjeet Gurjar PW-1, who said to be along with the injured Devraj when the incident took place, has specifically stated that the petitioner -Mukesh, has inflicted gun shot injury to injured- Devraj. The injured was immediately taken to the hospital at Chhabra and he being serious was taken to the SMS Hospital, Jaipur. As per the admission ticket dated 21.07.2025, the injured said to have sustained gun shot injury and on the basis of the treatment record, which is available in the case diary, the Doctor who prepared MLR has opined that the injury inflicted by the petitioner is dangerous to life. 8. Taking into consideration the specific allegation and the evidence against the petitioner of causing gun shot injury and the said injury being opined as dangerous to life, this Court is not inclined to entertain this third bail application. 9. Accordingly, this third bail application is dismissed. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J 4/ARTI SHARMA