[2026:RJ-JP:30446] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10901/2026 CNR: RJHC020621492026 | URN: CRLMB / 20177U / 2026 Kanhaiyya Lal S/o Bhanwar Das, R/o Village Sutra, Police Station Dabi District Bundi (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In Jail Bundi) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10902/2026 CNR: RJHC020601882026 | URN: CRLMB / 20181U / 2026 Lila Bai W/o Kanhaiyya Lal, R/o Village Sutra, Police Station Dabi District Bundi (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In Jail Bundi). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dushyant Singh Naruka For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP Mr. Rajesh Tailor, RPS, CO Taleda, Bundi HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 05/08/2026 1. The petitioners have filed these bail applications under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.199/2025 registered at Police Station Dabi, District Bundi for offences under Section 80(2) of BNS, 2023. 2. Since both these bail applications arise out of common FIR, hence, they are being decided by this common order. [2026:RJ-JP:30446] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-10901/2026] 3. Heard learned counsels for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 4. Learned counsels for the petitioners contend that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in these cases. It is submitted that the allegations against the present petitioners pertain to the alleged dowry demand in connection with the death of their daughter-in-law, Deepu. It is further submitted that the deceased, Deepu, committed suicide due to matrimonial disputes between herself and her husband and the present petitioners had no active involvement in any alleged demand for dowry. This is evident from the testimony of the complainant PW-1-Mukesh, recorded during the trial. In his cross-examination, PW-1 Mukesh specifically admitted that no complaint or case relating to dowry had been lodged against the present petitioners for the preceding three to four years. Petitioners, who are the father-in-law and mother-in-law of the deceased, have been in judicial custody since 21.06.2026 and 22.06.2026, respectively without any criminal past. Charge-sheet has already been filed. The statement of complainant has already been recorded. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in further custody, consequently, the bail applications deserves to be allowed. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications of the petitioners. 6. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in the light of submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners but without expressing any [2026:RJ-JP:30446] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-10901/2026] opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 7. Consequently, the bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S. are allowed and it is directed that the petitioners Kanhaiyya Lal S/o Bhanwar Das & Lila Bai W/o Kanhaiyya Lal be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that each of them shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/33-34