Ashutosh Dubey @ Chunmun Dubey v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./22721/2026 · 2026-04-16
Anshuman
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13325 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13325 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22721 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-332 Year-2025 Thana- BUXAR MUFFSIL District- Buxar ======================================================
1. Ashutosh Dubey @ Chunmun Dubey S/o Sri Divakar Dubey @ Diwakar Dubey R/o Village - Bhitribandh, P.S - Karamchat, District - Kaimur At present R/o Village - Chenari, P.S - Chenari, District - Rohtas
2. Vijay Dubey S/o Sri Divakar Dubey @ Diwakar Dubey R/o Village - Bhitribandh, P.S - Karamchat, District - Kaimur At present R/o Village - Chenari, P.S - Chenari, District - Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashutosh Tripathy, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 2 16-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending arrest in connection with Buxar Muffasil P.S. Case No. 332 of 2025 lodged on 05.10.2025, for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115, 109, 303(2) & 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita,
2023. 3. As per the prosecution, FIR has been lodged against three named accused persons including the present petitioners alleging that they have entered in the house of the informant and took away the informant’s wife and son who is aged about 1
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22721 of 2026(2) dt.16-04-2026 2/3 month and 12 days. Upon oppose by the informant, accused persons started abusing him and also assaulted him on the head by iron rod, due to which, he sustained injury and become unconscious. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. Counsel submits that the petitioners are brother in law/saala of the informant. Counsel submits that the petitioners went to their sister in law’s house to bring back their sister who is always abused by the informant (bahnoi of petitioners), which resulted into scuffling and present case has been lodged. Counsel further submits that the petitioner no.1 has one criminal antecedent, in which he is on bail and the petitioner no.2 has two criminal antecedents, and in both the cases, he is also on bail. 5.
Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioners but fairly submits that the from the pleading and FIR, it transpires that the present dispute is between the relatives i.e. saala and bahnoi. 6. As such, in the present facts and circumstances of this case, let the above named petitioners be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Trial Court within a period of 4 weeks from today, on furnishing
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22721 of 2026(2) dt.16-04-2026 3/3 bail bond of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand) each as mentioned in Section 2(1)(d) of the B.N.S.S., 2023 to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Buxar, in connection with Buxar Muffasil P.S. Case No. 332 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down U/s 482(2) of the B.N.S.S., 2023. Divyansh/- (Dr. Anshuman, J) U T