Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 9984 of 2026 Decided on: 29.06.2026 Santosh Kumari … Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? ____________________________________________________
_
For the petitioner: Mr. Vijay Bir Singh, Advocates. For the respondents: Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.1, 3 and 4. Mr. Tara Chand Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent No.2. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General and Mr. Tara Chand Chauhan, learned Counsel, accept notice on behalf of respective respondents.
2. On a query put to learned Counsel for the petitioner, as to how the petition is maintainable in light of the provisions of Order II, Rule 2 of the Civil Procedure Code, he prays for and is allowed to withdraw the petition, with liberty to file a fresh petition, assailing rejection of representation of the petitioner only.
3. The petition stands disposed of. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
(Ajay Mohan Goel)
Judge June 29, 2026 (Rishi)