Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13324 (BOM)

RAMESH GOVIND SAGGAM v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME AND ORS

WP/12529/2026 · 2026-09-28

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

48-WP-12529-2026.DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.12529 OF 2026 Ramesh Govind Saggam ..Petitioner Versus The State Of Maharashtra Thr. Principal Secretary Home & Ors …Respondents Ms. Megha Jain i/by Mr. Vinayak Salokhe, VRS Legal, for the Petitioner. Mr. Kedar Dighe, Addl. G.P. a/w Mr. P.G. Sawant, AGP, for the Respondent-State. CORAM : N. J. JAMADAR, J. DATE : 28th SEPTEMBER 2026 P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the Petitioner. 2. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that, the Petitioner has filed a Revision Application against the impugned Order passed in Appeal before the State Government, in the month of February, 2026. However, the said Revision Application has yet not been decided. 3. As the Petitioner has already invoked the remedy of revision before the State Government, there is no propriety in entertaining the Petition. 4. The Petition stands disposed with a direction to Respondent No.1, to hear and decide the Revision Application as PRIYANKA 1/2 SAINATH SANJAY BODKHE Digitally signed by SAINATH SANJAY BODKHE Date: 2026.09.30 21:22:37 +0530 48-WP-12529-2026.DOC expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of six weeks from 5th October 2026. 5. The Petitioner shall appear before the Respondent No.1 on 5th October 2026. 6. It is hereby made clear that this Court has not entered into the merits of the matter and all contentions of all the parties are kept open for consideration. [N. J. JAMADAR, J.] PRIYANKA 2/2